So thankfully, you can expect less and less development technique herein
I also came back with good shots. More to come later. This was done in the early morning - right before the sun began to show its face.
9/17/2005
Entrance, Grand Central
Last night and early this morning I went out to do more shooting with the HP5 @ 800 in DD-X. Just to confirm that this was a good combination. I confirmed it.
So thankfully, you can expect less and less development technique herein
I also came back with good shots. More to come later. This was done in the early morning - right before the sun began to show its face.
So thankfully, you can expect less and less development technique herein
I also came back with good shots. More to come later. This was done in the early morning - right before the sun began to show its face.
R2A Shutter & M Series
Dear Leica,
I was bemoaning that the R2A was somewhat noisy compared to the Leica M - and SteveR commented that:
"As for the VC R2A shutters, they are basically SLR designs, so the fact that they are much noisier than a Leica isn't surprising."
Okay. It does look like an SLR type shutter -
Can you tell me what goes into the cost of a current Leica body and why it costs as much as it does. After all, design goes back to the early part of the last century.
Or to put it another way - are they so expensive because they are expensive to make - or is it expensive because only a relatively small number will sell? Can't you make your real money on the lenses? If you sold the body "at cost" - couldn't you still make real money on the lenses, since more people would buy the bodies. Or is it too late for that now with the M mount patent gone.
Well, if you don't want to or can't answer - I'm sure that some of the Leica cognoscenti could clear up the M business model in two seconds flat.
Signed,
An ardent admirer
I was bemoaning that the R2A was somewhat noisy compared to the Leica M - and SteveR commented that:
"As for the VC R2A shutters, they are basically SLR designs, so the fact that they are much noisier than a Leica isn't surprising."
Okay. It does look like an SLR type shutter -
Can you tell me what goes into the cost of a current Leica body and why it costs as much as it does. After all, design goes back to the early part of the last century.
Or to put it another way - are they so expensive because they are expensive to make - or is it expensive because only a relatively small number will sell? Can't you make your real money on the lenses? If you sold the body "at cost" - couldn't you still make real money on the lenses, since more people would buy the bodies. Or is it too late for that now with the M mount patent gone.
Well, if you don't want to or can't answer - I'm sure that some of the Leica cognoscenti could clear up the M business model in two seconds flat.
Signed,
An ardent admirer
9/16/2005
Night HP5+ Shots
Night Deposit (Garbo 2)
The results from the HP5 @ 800 ASA look fine.
DD-X for 10 minutes @ 68F; 4 inversions per minute.
I am not going to post pure tests, but actual shots that I like from this roll.
BTW, the guy was looking through a collection of CDs and this was taken about 11:30 pm.
Night Couple
A crop of the right side of a horizontal (pushed) negative.
133 Prints for Sale
Yes, I finished proofing another 15 prints or so - and put them up for sale. I starting to wonder whether I need to separate them into the usual separate galleries: people / places / things since people tend to see pictures in those categories. I don't.
I like spinning through the whole thing. But I'm not - I don't think I am - the typical consumer. I like the contrast between the images. And anyone, as noted - very few people pictures sell. Why clog up the places with stuff to be skipped over?
Why should people be less worthwhile to put on the wall than pictures of the park.
I like spinning through the whole thing. But I'm not - I don't think I am - the typical consumer. I like the contrast between the images. And anyone, as noted - very few people pictures sell. Why clog up the places with stuff to be skipped over?
Why should people be less worthwhile to put on the wall than pictures of the park.
Time Time Time
To run a website with your own photographs for sale - takes much more effort than you'd think. If you've never tried it - you should.
Besides the non-photographic technical skills you need there are constant readjustments. Yesterday began when something went wrong with my shopping cart (which I had built from scratch about five years ago). I was never happy with it. Lot's of Active Server Page code and then there was the cost of a secure certificate, and I was tied in to a system with a merchant bank that charged me $49 a month for the processing of orders plus the credit card companies took their usual percentage.
So when it was going flakey yesterday - and I started to look at the code:
"Line 217: ccur is null" (yes, I knew what it meant - trouble converting a null value to currency but why - why - why?)
I couldn't face the beast anymore. Why ccur should be null yesterday, when it hadn't ever been null before. I hadn't changed any code. Something must have changed on the server. Maybe their database was and one of my stored procs was failing... Maybe their version of ASP was upgraded. Who knows.
And so lickety split I looked at the Paypal cart option (the simplest and cheapest one they have).
By end of day the cart mechansim from the olden days had been replaced with the Paypal cart. Now if something goes wrong - it's going to go wrong with about a couple of million people at the same time.
I like that.
Next step.
I had meant to raise the size and price of a number of items. Did that. Then add new prints. Did that. My workflow was simple and familiar and I was happy. Happy enough that after working on the PC all day - I went out at about 11 p.m. to shoot some film. Mostly, I just wanted to shoot HP5 plus at 800 (which I did). I kept telling myself - this is a test roll - don't shoot anything good! But of course stuff happens and I did take some good shots.
I had asked Matt for his TMAX developer / HP 800 time and temps but I still want to try this stuff again in DD-X. I don't like the idea of having two developers to work with. And so - to show you how my subconscious works - I had a dream about developing the HP5 in DD-X and in the dream I was looking at the negatives and they were perfect negatives.
I shot with the R2A and I have to tell you that late last night - with very few people on the street - the "click" of the little near perfect camera caused a couple of stares.
On my way home I was still puzzled as to why they went through all the trouble of making this Leica clone but neglected to make it quieter. I've heard theories that it's because of the metal vertical shutter, but I don't believe that. The G2 for example (bad viewfinder and all) was quieter. I even have this Russian knockoff that Steve sent me - which has a cloth shutter and slow top speed and it is the noisiest rangefinder I've ever held. Clunk!
I would have opted for a quiter R2A even if it had a slower top speed. The quietness is probably the single most important feature of a good rangefinder.
I'm sure that next year - hopefully I do okay in the holiday (Christmas) season - I'll start looking for a used M6. Did anyone ever tell me that 'you get what you pay for.' In most cases. But the problem is not always. For example the Voigtlander lenses, if you chose carefully - are excellent. At least the 28 f1.9 is.
Well anyway - I haven't done much shooting this week because of futzing with the website. And I'm going to spend one more day (I swear that's it) adding more prints for sale. My next goal is to get up to 125 prints. Of course, my goal after that is 150, then 200! I can't put crap up either. It all has to be good stuff. And it has to have been printed first. I never put anything up for sale just looking at the image on the screen.
But I've got an easy system for doing it now (only took five years).
Then I'm going to close my account with the merchant bank (saves me $49) a month. And next time the dumb SSL certificate expires - let it die. The site is now so simple - just HTML and CSS (no need for SSL or a database) that it could be hosted anywhere.
Paypal also offers a more robust plan for $20 a month that includes a way to take credit cards over the phone / fax etc. If someone can't or doesn't want to do it over the web. This second plan - I think they call it Paypal Pro allows you to integrate the cart etc. into your own site so it doesn't take you to Paypal site for the checkout. I'll have to read through the manual at some point and see if it's worth the effort.
On top of all that - I began putting up Ads through Google. These are ads that you (me) pay for by the click. So there's another "non-photographic" thing to keep an eye with an futz with.
So as I say - you need to have some fascination with how this stuff works unless you can afford to have someone do it all for you. I think they call them Webmasters. For the individual artist to afford a Webmaster - that is a luxury that most photographers can't afford - at least not on a regular basis.
And yes, there are sites that will do it all for you - that specialize in selling photographs - but now you're back in the world of physical galleries (in a way) and they want their cut of the pie.
So - all in all - I'm in good shape in cyberworld. This is just a word of caution.
I often get e-mails asking whether I can make a living from this from (and I'm going to call them kids) - wondering whether they could quit their dayjobs and make a living selling their photographs on the web.
My answer is always the same: if you can go part time with the day job, or get the website going while you're at the job - then do it. You can't count on a dime coming from it - especially when you get started. No one wants to hear that. In fact - I've sent out about five replies with that basic message and gotten no, "Thank you e-mails back." I don't think they want to hear it.
I tell stories about talented photographers (no names) that haven't sold a print through their website during the last year.
I make it as bleak as I can because that is the reality. Oh - reality! We've had enough reality. Follow your dream. But be prepared for hard lifting to make it work - and that hard lifting has absolutely nothing with photographic talent.
And then I was waiting for some order(s) to come in to see if the thing was working. And sure enough - last night - two orders came in through the new system. I got a nice notification. All the info was there.
Besides the non-photographic technical skills you need there are constant readjustments. Yesterday began when something went wrong with my shopping cart (which I had built from scratch about five years ago). I was never happy with it. Lot's of Active Server Page code and then there was the cost of a secure certificate, and I was tied in to a system with a merchant bank that charged me $49 a month for the processing of orders plus the credit card companies took their usual percentage.
So when it was going flakey yesterday - and I started to look at the code:
"Line 217: ccur is null" (yes, I knew what it meant - trouble converting a null value to currency but why - why - why?)
I couldn't face the beast anymore. Why ccur should be null yesterday, when it hadn't ever been null before. I hadn't changed any code. Something must have changed on the server. Maybe their database was and one of my stored procs was failing... Maybe their version of ASP was upgraded. Who knows.
And so lickety split I looked at the Paypal cart option (the simplest and cheapest one they have).
By end of day the cart mechansim from the olden days had been replaced with the Paypal cart. Now if something goes wrong - it's going to go wrong with about a couple of million people at the same time.
I like that.
Next step.
I had meant to raise the size and price of a number of items. Did that. Then add new prints. Did that. My workflow was simple and familiar and I was happy. Happy enough that after working on the PC all day - I went out at about 11 p.m. to shoot some film. Mostly, I just wanted to shoot HP5 plus at 800 (which I did). I kept telling myself - this is a test roll - don't shoot anything good! But of course stuff happens and I did take some good shots.
I had asked Matt for his TMAX developer / HP 800 time and temps but I still want to try this stuff again in DD-X. I don't like the idea of having two developers to work with. And so - to show you how my subconscious works - I had a dream about developing the HP5 in DD-X and in the dream I was looking at the negatives and they were perfect negatives.
I shot with the R2A and I have to tell you that late last night - with very few people on the street - the "click" of the little near perfect camera caused a couple of stares.
On my way home I was still puzzled as to why they went through all the trouble of making this Leica clone but neglected to make it quieter. I've heard theories that it's because of the metal vertical shutter, but I don't believe that. The G2 for example (bad viewfinder and all) was quieter. I even have this Russian knockoff that Steve sent me - which has a cloth shutter and slow top speed and it is the noisiest rangefinder I've ever held. Clunk!
I would have opted for a quiter R2A even if it had a slower top speed. The quietness is probably the single most important feature of a good rangefinder.
I'm sure that next year - hopefully I do okay in the holiday (Christmas) season - I'll start looking for a used M6. Did anyone ever tell me that 'you get what you pay for.' In most cases. But the problem is not always. For example the Voigtlander lenses, if you chose carefully - are excellent. At least the 28 f1.9 is.
Well anyway - I haven't done much shooting this week because of futzing with the website. And I'm going to spend one more day (I swear that's it) adding more prints for sale. My next goal is to get up to 125 prints. Of course, my goal after that is 150, then 200! I can't put crap up either. It all has to be good stuff. And it has to have been printed first. I never put anything up for sale just looking at the image on the screen.
But I've got an easy system for doing it now (only took five years).
Then I'm going to close my account with the merchant bank (saves me $49) a month. And next time the dumb SSL certificate expires - let it die. The site is now so simple - just HTML and CSS (no need for SSL or a database) that it could be hosted anywhere.
Paypal also offers a more robust plan for $20 a month that includes a way to take credit cards over the phone / fax etc. If someone can't or doesn't want to do it over the web. This second plan - I think they call it Paypal Pro allows you to integrate the cart etc. into your own site so it doesn't take you to Paypal site for the checkout. I'll have to read through the manual at some point and see if it's worth the effort.
On top of all that - I began putting up Ads through Google. These are ads that you (me) pay for by the click. So there's another "non-photographic" thing to keep an eye with an futz with.
So as I say - you need to have some fascination with how this stuff works unless you can afford to have someone do it all for you. I think they call them Webmasters. For the individual artist to afford a Webmaster - that is a luxury that most photographers can't afford - at least not on a regular basis.
And yes, there are sites that will do it all for you - that specialize in selling photographs - but now you're back in the world of physical galleries (in a way) and they want their cut of the pie.
So - all in all - I'm in good shape in cyberworld. This is just a word of caution.
I often get e-mails asking whether I can make a living from this from (and I'm going to call them kids) - wondering whether they could quit their dayjobs and make a living selling their photographs on the web.
My answer is always the same: if you can go part time with the day job, or get the website going while you're at the job - then do it. You can't count on a dime coming from it - especially when you get started. No one wants to hear that. In fact - I've sent out about five replies with that basic message and gotten no, "Thank you e-mails back." I don't think they want to hear it.
I tell stories about talented photographers (no names) that haven't sold a print through their website during the last year.
I make it as bleak as I can because that is the reality. Oh - reality! We've had enough reality. Follow your dream. But be prepared for hard lifting to make it work - and that hard lifting has absolutely nothing with photographic talent.
And then I was waiting for some order(s) to come in to see if the thing was working. And sure enough - last night - two orders came in through the new system. I got a nice notification. All the info was there.
9/15/2005
Crater Park
Between Sedona, on the way to Flagstaff - I believe it is called National Crater Park. One of my favorite spots to feel a little closer to the center of the earth.
Mailbag
[These are all true - more or less.]
- Mr. Beckerman,
I am working on a book about aquatic pleasure crafts and wondered if you a) had any pictures of same or b) knew a photographer who was good with that sort of thing. I would like the book to be cheery and inspirational. I thought black and white might be good for that.
Have a great day. - JL
An actual phone call at 8:30 a.m.
Phone: Good morning. Do you make 20 x 30 copies?
Me: Huh?
Phone: 20 x 30 copies? Do you make them?
Me: Do you mean my pictures? No - not at -
Phone: No. I meant - aren't you a full-service photography store?
Me: No. I'm in an apartment...
Phone: Oh. I got your number from the web. Sorry.
Me: That's alright.
[hang-up]
More e-mails
-Dave,
I have been reading your blog for a long time now. How do you come up with new stuff to write everyday?
(By including your e-mails and phone calls)
-Mr. Beckerman,
i was wordering why you charge soooo much for your photos?? because i can make a very good one that's bigger than what u sell for about $1.00 on my printer!!! In black and white!!! it really looks good. so - no offense - but i wuz just curious about your expenses. Keep up the good work.
Miles.
Miles, now that you mention it, prices are going up tomorrow.
- Mr. Beckerman,
I am working on a book about aquatic pleasure crafts and wondered if you a) had any pictures of same or b) knew a photographer who was good with that sort of thing. I would like the book to be cheery and inspirational. I thought black and white might be good for that.
Have a great day. - JL
An actual phone call at 8:30 a.m.
Phone: Good morning. Do you make 20 x 30 copies?
Me: Huh?
Phone: 20 x 30 copies? Do you make them?
Me: Do you mean my pictures? No - not at -
Phone: No. I meant - aren't you a full-service photography store?
Me: No. I'm in an apartment...
Phone: Oh. I got your number from the web. Sorry.
Me: That's alright.
[hang-up]
More e-mails
-Dave,
I have been reading your blog for a long time now. How do you come up with new stuff to write everyday?
(By including your e-mails and phone calls)
-Mr. Beckerman,
i was wordering why you charge soooo much for your photos?? because i can make a very good one that's bigger than what u sell for about $1.00 on my printer!!! In black and white!!! it really looks good. so - no offense - but i wuz just curious about your expenses. Keep up the good work.
Miles.
Miles, now that you mention it, prices are going up tomorrow.
9/14/2005
Tech Talk
So after doing a lot of printing at 12 x 18 from the new Tri-x DD-X (that's a lot of x's) I decided to add the new prints to the site. But much to my dismay (:*&?^&!!) something went wrong with the cart mechanism (home grown) probaby because of some ASP upgrade on the server. Anyway - I just said "f**k it) - and looked at the Paypal Cart. Simplest one they've got.
Two hours later - I've redone the for sale prints and jettisoned my cart. The way I'm set up, not as difficult as you'd think since you can take their "form" and supply it through your web generator template (thank you iViewPro) with tokens that translate into values.
I know that's unclear but it's very easy.
Now, did I jump from the frying pan into the fire - or was this a good idea? Let's see. My own theory is that people have more confidence in the Paypal Cart than in mine.
Their are cosmetics to deal with (I can use my own "cart" icon) etc. and create a return page for the transaction. But in my first tests - seems to work fine.
Two hours later - I've redone the for sale prints and jettisoned my cart. The way I'm set up, not as difficult as you'd think since you can take their "form" and supply it through your web generator template (thank you iViewPro) with tokens that translate into values.
I know that's unclear but it's very easy.
Now, did I jump from the frying pan into the fire - or was this a good idea? Let's see. My own theory is that people have more confidence in the Paypal Cart than in mine.
Their are cosmetics to deal with (I can use my own "cart" icon) etc. and create a return page for the transaction. But in my first tests - seems to work fine.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)