data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7703a/7703a2563747144d8e3a982d97a7d434dba87067" alt="dave beckerman photography"
As I was walking around (at night) shooting the second roll with the R2A - looking for places to use the 40mm at f1.4 - this plastered guy who was standing nearby approached speaking a language I couldn't understand - though somehow he made it known that he wanted me to take his picture and that he had a specific pose in mind - this one.
He made various flourishes - such as you might make to a King - and then kneeled. Possibly this had something to do with being presented to the Queen of England.
Afterwards - he thanked me - again in an unknown tongue - bowing and scraping and sometimes sputtering "thank you."
[Most of my time is going into getting my development times right - and I'm still futzing with various developers. This was in TMAX. You know, the appearance / sharpness etc. of the film grain is different with different developers. ]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf35e/cf35e7572ef16d2a83b5365e32d3af148a7d2cd5" alt="dave beckerman photography"
Untouched crop. F1.4, 1/30 sec. Light was from the storefront that was behind me.
It's a bit soft - though certainly printable. It is also not a fair test - or at least not a scientifc test - since it was a fairly slow shutter speed, was pretty dark, and who knows if my focus was 100% on target.
I went out this morning and shot another roll - all at f5.6 which should be pretty close to the meat of the lens - and all of shots that had very small lettering somewhere that I focused on. Things that I know from experience that with the Hexar or the M lenses should be readable with a 16x loupe.
And of course I've made one of the oldest scientific mistakes - using several different developers - which effect appearance of sharpness. For this last roll with the tiny lettering, I went back to my old HC110B formula. News at 5.