8/14/2005

Tattoo Reflection

dave beckerman photography
I've gotten the look that I'm after. This was done in bright sunlight: Tri-x, dd-x, 6 minutes, 75F. The shots I took in deep shade look fine as well. Au revoir to le testing. BTW, the light meter on the R2A has been very consistent. Luke sent me a note about it being "bottom-weighted" which is definitely true. It doesn't care much about the sky which is nice since I don't either.

Hot

Hot. Very hot... Sidewalks melting... Streets deserted...

Since I got the R2A I've developed 20 rolls of film - one at a time for testing purposes. I'm going to develop one more roll of Tri-x in Ilfotec DD-X and then call it a week.

The rapid winder: now that is an odd contraption. Yet I'm sort of getting used to it. Adds a bit of heft and a small grip to the camera.

Can you use a "real" motorized drive with the R2a? If you can, that's probably a better bet.

Cuts

dave beckerman photography
This was underdeveloped by accident - I read the times wrong - but still not bad (Tri-x / DD-X; I did it for 6.5 minutes instead of 8 minutes).

And always remember - the one group of New York denizens that love to be photographed: hair stylists. If you come to New York and want to find relaxed people who are thrilled to have a camera pointed at them - stop by any of the hair salons on the Upper East Side. I don't know if this generosity extends to the West Side.

8/13/2005

On the Corner

dave beckerman photography
of 86th and Lex.

Tri-x in Ilfotec DDX.

8/12/2005

tri-x

dave beckerman photography
Cat on Pipe

I'm getting closer... These were done with Tri-x and TMAX developer. I've seen different times for this film. Inside of the box says, 6.5 minutes; TMAX developer says, 6.0 minutes. I did it at 6 minutes / 400 ASA / 6 minutes / a bit less agitation then the recommend.

More Film

Dispite the heat - I've been out shooting a lot. The odd thing is that I picked up a roll of PLUS-X and a roll of TRI-X of all things. I also shot a roll of TMY @ 200. And Fujifilm Neopan 400 has been recommended by a few but I can't buy it in the neighborhood. Maybe on Sunday.

This could be some sort of multi- mid-life film crisis. Ah, I remember the beautiful gray tones I got from Plus-X. And - on top of all that - I actually got some good shots:

- Water main broke and they dyed the water red. So lots of people stopping on the corner with puzzled expressions as if this was some sort of conceptional art exhibit - which in a way it became. Can't say there were a bunch of HCB type of jumping over the puddle - New Yorkers mostly walk around it. But there were lots of puzzled expressions - everyone asking me if I knew what it was all about.

And then I found a stray cat wandering around through these sort of underground passages created by steps and garbage bins - and followed the cat around for about a half hour.

Even found the source of the water main break and took some welding shots. All in all - a good morning.

I think I should at least keep some variables constant - so it's either HC110B or TMAX Developer for all of them...

Oh and speaking of Tri-x and Plus-x there seems to be three types of each:
For example:
Plus-X Pan (what's that the old version from HCB days?)
Plus-X Pan Professional (Ah - you've graduated to a professional, congrats?)
And what I got: Professional Plus-X 125 (shortest development times)

I'm using time / temp. from the box it came in. The times for using HC110B are way to short for either the Tri-x of the new and improved (I hope) Plus-X.


News at noon (tomorrow).

8/11/2005

Homeless Corner

dave beckerman photography

Stair Pattern

dave beckerman photography

Eye Patch

dave beckerman photography
I've been standing on the corner of 2nd and 83rd photographing passersby, or high contrast scenes - experimenting again with the film. This fellow was unloading produce for a nearby Italian restaurant and agreed to let me photograph him and yes - the experiments are over.

This was with TMY @ 300 ASA; 5 minutes @ 75F with TMAX developer (1:4) Hopefully that will be my new "standard." It seems to work fine in bright sunlight/shadow and, so long as I expose for shadow areas - works well in flatter scenes. This is from a straight neg. scan without any adjustments. More to follow...

blogger spam

So since I started using the blogger comments, I'm beginning to get automated spam for the usual crap in the comments. I may have to turn on the "login" if you want to comment - or else go back to haloscan if this continues. So far I'm just getting one or two a day which I've been manually deleting.

I'll have to see if their are any other settings that can control this automated junk.

Development / Film

As I mentioned in previous post - I'm leaning towards TMY again. I shot with it a lot in the past - and somewhere along the line switched to HP5 in HC110B. Possibly my tastes have changed since then - but the TMY seems to be a bit smoother. Anyway - right now I'm using TMY @ 400 ASA - in TMAX developer 1:4 at recommended times. But I'm going to experiment with a bit of underdevelopment and making sure I'm still picking up shadow detail. I might take it down about 20%, i.e. the highlights in bright contrasty scenes are still a bit high for my taste. But after a couple of days of experimenting - I'm pretty close.